Jens Geyer created THRIFT-5627:
----------------------------------
Summary: More consistent syntax for cpp_type
Key: THRIFT-5627
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-5627
Project: Thrift
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Compiler (General)
Reporter: Jens Geyer
Assignee: Jens Geyer
As a side effect on my current work I recognized a warning that was there
before:
Essentially it boils down to the list in these definitions taken from
https://thrift.apache.org/docs/idl
{code}
[28] MapType ::= 'map' {color:#DE350B}CppType?{color} '<' FieldType
',' FieldType '>'
[29] SetType ::= 'set' {color:#DE350B}CppType?{color} '<' FieldType '>'
[30] ListType ::= 'list' '<' FieldType '>'
{color:#DE350B}CppType?{color}
{code}
I wonder why we need it this way at all. Wouldn't it be better if list<> set<>
and map<> would expect the same syntax?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
