Ouch, just saw this. Oliver, I'm happy to commit the updated patch to the trunk but do you absolutely need this in 1.4 requiring me to spin up an RC #3?
Cheers, Chris -----Original Message----- From: Oliver Heger <[email protected]> Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Sunday, June 16, 2013 10:25 AM To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache TIka 1.4 Release Candidate #1 >Am 16.06.2013 05:52, schrieb Chris Mattmann: >> Hi Guys, >> >> A candidate for the Tika 1.4 release is available at: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~mattmann/apache-tika-1.4/rc1/ >> >> The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tika/tags/1.4/ >> >> >> The SHA1 checksum of the archive is >> 1e523c6ed06b4d095d7f6e93a04a8d2ab43c7226. >> >> A staged M2 repository can also be found on repository.apache.org here: >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetika-020/ >> >> >> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Tika 1.4. >> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a majority of at >> least three +1 Tika PMC votes are cast. >> >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Tika 1.4 >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... >> >> Here is my +1 for the release. >> >> Cheers, >> Chris >> > >There is a minor issue with TIKA-991: The original patch had been >applied, but in the meantime I discovered that the code could enter an >infinite loop under certain circumstances. Therefore, I provided a >second patch (the small attachment from Feb 15th). Could this patch be >applied, too, before the release? > >Thanks >Oliver >
