[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14167194#comment-14167194
]
Tilman Hausherr commented on TIKA-1442:
---------------------------------------
Do you want the junk list in some format? Just the six digits, or the directory
too?
Because this manual checking takes a lot of time, I'm planning to download the
entire directory and store the PDFs only.
We should agree on criteria for exclusion. Suggestion:
- files that at some place don't display with Adobe Reader (this applies to
most, if not all the files that have exceptions with LZW or Flate)
- files that do display, but have only junk when doing copy & paste in Adobe
Reader
Re 1.8.8 yes I'm obviously unhappy with 1.8.7. But the token comparison should
first be improved so that we're really sure not to have major regressions.
(Although I'm optimistic based on your tests that show only one smaller
regression)
> Upgrade to PDFBox 1.8.8
> -----------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-1442
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1442
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Tim Allison
> Assignee: Tim Allison
> Fix For: 1.7
>
>
> Given the regressions we identified in PDFBox 1.8.7, we should upgrade to
> 1.8.8 as soon as it is ready. I'm tempted to call this a blocker on Tika
> 1.7. Let's use this issue to carry on the discussion of regression testing
> (if any further discussion is necessary) or any other prep that needs to
> happen before 1.8.8's release.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
