[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14182047#comment-14182047
]
Tilman Hausherr commented on TIKA-1442:
---------------------------------------
A few files have less meta data than before:
019/019837.pdf
138/138155.pdf
221/221001.pdf
224/224644.pdf
308/308233.pdf
469/469387.pdf
490/490345.pdf
490/490344.pdf
597/597244.pdf
643/643910.pdf
Could you tell what you get in TIKA for the first one?
> Upgrade to PDFBox 1.8.8
> -----------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-1442
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1442
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Tim Allison
> Assignee: Tim Allison
> Fix For: 1.7
>
> Attachments: pdfbox_1_8_6V1_8_8-SNAPSHOT.xlsx,
> pdfbox_1_8_6V1_8_8-SNAPSHOTb.xlsx, pdfbox_1_8_6V1_8_8-SNAPSHOTc.xlsx,
> pdfbox_1_8_6V1_8_8-SNAPSHOTc.zip
>
>
> Given the regressions we identified in PDFBox 1.8.7, we should upgrade to
> 1.8.8 as soon as it is ready. I'm tempted to call this a blocker on Tika
> 1.7. Let's use this issue to carry on the discussion of regression testing
> (if any further discussion is necessary) or any other prep that needs to
> happen before 1.8.8's release.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
