[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14224678#comment-14224678
]
Tim Allison edited comment on TIKA-1442 at 11/25/14 4:01 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
This is a comparison of PDFBox 1.8.6 and PDFBox 1.8.8-SNAPSHOT build 145. This
was run via Tika 1.7-SNAPSHOT which uses as default the classic parser. This
was run against a random selection of 50,000 PDF files from the govdocs1 corpus.
I'll post a comparison file of 1.8.8-SNAPSHOT-145 with classic vs. nonSeq
shortly.
It looks like there are only a few regressions, and many improvements.
was (Author: [email protected]):
This is a comparison of PDFBox 1.8.6 and PDFBox 1.8.8-SNAPSHOT build 145. This
was run via Tika 1.7-SNAPSHOT which uses as default the classic parser. I'll
post a comparison file of 1.8.8-SNAPSHOT-145 with classic vs. nonSeq shortly.
It looks like there are only a few regressions, and many improvements.
> Upgrade to PDFBox 1.8.8
> -----------------------
>
> Key: TIKA-1442
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-1442
> Project: Tika
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Tim Allison
> Assignee: Tim Allison
> Fix For: 1.8
>
> Attachments: PDFBox_1_8_6VPDFBox_1_8_8-b145.xlsx,
> PDFBox_1_8_8-ClassicVPDFBox_1_8_8-NonSeq.xlsx,
> pdfbox_1_8_6V1_8_8-SNAPSHOT.xlsx, pdfbox_1_8_6V1_8_8-SNAPSHOTb.xlsx,
> pdfbox_1_8_6V1_8_8-SNAPSHOTc.xlsx, pdfbox_1_8_6V1_8_8-SNAPSHOTc.zip
>
>
> Given the regressions we identified in PDFBox 1.8.7, we should upgrade to
> 1.8.8 as soon as it is ready. I'm tempted to call this a blocker on Tika
> 1.7. Let's use this issue to carry on the discussion of regression testing
> (if any further discussion is necessary) or any other prep that needs to
> happen before 1.8.8's release.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
