[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16983541#comment-16983541
 ] 

Tim Allison commented on TIKA-2925:
-----------------------------------

[~tilman], thank you for raising these items for discussion.

1. com.pff:java-libpst -- I didn't upgrade that because of this: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16324009#comment-16324009

2. metadata-extractor -- I didn't upgrade that because of the change in 
namespace, and I was worried that'd break code for people using our xmp module. 
 I asked privately if we could get anyone at Adobe to release their xmp module 
without the internal namespace.  I haven't heard anything back.  If anyone 
knows anyone at Adobe who would be willing to do this, please, please do ask.  

I was wondering if we could shade+relocate that library in the near term to get 
rid of the {{internal.}} namespace. Thoughts? 

3. edu.ucar:grib -- I didn't upgrade that because the jump in major version # 
frightened me.  I _think_ I tried to upgrade it earlier, and I would have had 
do redo a bunch of our code...this could be a faulty memory.

So, my preference would be to put off 1) until libpst is fixed, 2) until we 
have success with shade+relocating or another solution and 3) until someone who 
knows that library can upgrade our code.

What do you and fellow devs think?

> General dependency/plugin upgrades for 1.23
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TIKA-2925
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA-2925
>             Project: Tika
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Tim Allison
>            Priority: Minor
>




--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to