Let me look at this issue Greg. Please, I'd appreciate if you could
provide a JIRA if you have a failing test case.

On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Greg Dritschler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luciano,
>
> Is the support for the security annotations complete?  I gave them a try but
> ran into a problem.  I see that the policy-security module contains
> 'skeleton' policy set definitions for the policy sets that are needed to
> support the annotations:
>
>     <policySet name="runAs" appliesTo="sca:implementation.java"/>
>     <policySet name="allow" appliesTo="sca:implementation.java"/>
>     <policySet name="rolesAllowed" appliesTo="sca:implementation.java"/>
>     <policySet name="permitAll" appliesTo="sca:implementation.java"/>
>     <policySet name="denyAll" appliesTo="sca:implementation.java"/>
>
> JSR250PolicyProcessor constructs the actual policy based on the role names
> in the annotation.  It turns off the unresolved flag in the policy model, I
> assume in an attempt to bypass resolving the model.  However this does not
> appear to work.  During resolve processing, the policy set references are
> resolved to the 'skeleton' policy set definitions, causing the policy
> content added by the JSR250PolicyProcessor to be lost.
>
> Greg
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:15 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Support for "Authorization and Security Identity Policy" (rev #661186)
>>  is now working, and I have created an iTest (rev #661188) that
>> exercise this functionality.
>>
>> I'm also looking into adding support for JSR250 security annotations,
>> basically allowing to define these policies direct into your java
>> artifacts.
>>
>> On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:21 AM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > I have started looking at support for "Authorization and Security
>> > Identity Policy" and supporting JSR250. Looks like we have the
>> > necessary models and some policy definitions.xml available in the
>> > policy-security module to support this, but looks like these
>> > processors are not hooked up to the overall runtime. Does anybody have
>> > more details on this ?
>> >
>> > --
>> > Luciano Resende
>> > Apache Tuscany Committer
>> > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Luciano Resende
>> Apache Tuscany Committer
>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
>



-- 
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to