On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Wojtek Janiszewski < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all, > I fulfilled almost all TODOs initially planned for CORBA binding. There are > also 2 other functionalities left (support for CORBA arrays, support for > CORBA unions) which are rather simple to implement and can be done meantime. > > Recently I heard from you some propositions regarding general CORBA > development in Tuscany which are: > > 1. Sharing some code between CORBA and EJB bindings, ML archive link - [1] > 2. Lightweight implementation of the SCA default binding over the corba > binding, JIRA link - [2]. > > There is also initially planned from GSoC proposal: > > 3. tuscany-interface-idl module implementation > > I'm not sure about work consumptions for each proposition, but fulfilling > every proposal may be not possible before GSoC deadline - it's good time to > refine plan for second development phase. I'd like to hear from you what in > your opinion would be the most useful. My proposition is to start > implementing 2 - it could be occasion to use CORBA binding more frequently, > gain access to more tests and have possibility to know more possible > weaknesses of CORBA implementation avoiding end-user being covered by bugs. > What do you think? > > Thanks, > Wojtek > > [1] - http://marc.info/?l=tuscany-dev&m=121553735213114&w=2 > [2] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2469 > Doing (2) sounds good to me as well, and one other thing as you've made such great progress with the binding would be write some doc about it for the wiki like we have for the other extensions. You could add a page in http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home to work on it and use the others as examples, eg [1], [2], [3]. ...ant [1] http://tuscany.apache.org/sca-java-bindingjms.html [2] http://tuscany.apache.org/sca-java-bindingejb.html [3] http://tuscany.apache.org/sca-java-bindingws.html
