Do you mean SCA WS and JMS bindings instead of Spring bindings? If yes, your proposal looks pretty good to me.
Thanks, Raymond From: Ramkumar R Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 11:26 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [DISCUSS] Extending simple-bigbank-spring sample Hi, Existing bigbank-sample for spring seems to be a simplified version of the bigbank demo. I believe extending the current sample would help us to realize spring in a broader way and would explain how far TUSCANY supports Spring Implementation and its limitations if any. I like to take this forward using a step-by-step development approach as shown below. Step 1: Extend the current sample by implementing the components and composites as we have done in the bigbank demo. Make sure that each SCA composite is generated from a spring context and use them within an SCA assembly, this way we will have multiple spring context available. Step 2: Enable communication between some of the components using Spring Web Service bindings. Step 3: Enable communication between some of the components using Spring JMS bindings. Step 4: Introduces Policies like security for the components. Please let me know if you have any comments / suggestions for the same. Currently, I am working on Step 1 and will be opening a JIRA to provide the patch shortly. -- Thanks & Regards, Ramkumar Ramalingam
