On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Mike Edwards < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Laws wrote: > >> >> <snip> > >> Excellent Luciano. Well found. If they came from Tuscany in the first >> place, which this post would seem to suggest, they can stay with the ASL2 >> license. >> >> I agree about sca.tld though. Judging by the commit log that was copied >> from the spec. >> >> Regards >> >> Simon >> > Folks, > > If those files are derived from material in the OSOA specs, then they will > fall under the license of the OSOA specs. > > I dont see how the material can use an ASL2 license. > > > Yours, Mike. > Mike Looking back at svn it seems that it was the other way round for the sca-api files. Part of them came from the original IBM/BEA contribution and subsequent development went on in sandboxes (presumably in parallel with the spec development) before they were copied into trunk. I assume that the people involved in creating these files chose to contribute them to Tuscany and ASF2 license them and also chose to contribute them to OSOA for inclusion in the spec. Sound plausible? Simon
