Several alternatives have been suggested [1] which I summarize here.

A) Start from what we already have in trunk, develop the OASIS function,
introduce new improvements or improvements from the Equinox branch as
appropriate
B) Start from a completely clean trunk and build up from there based on the
resources we have in the the 1.x code stream, in the Equinox branch or from
new developments
C) Start from what is in the Equinox branch

Is this correct? Are there other combinations people want to consider? There
is a related question of how we develop trunk toward OASIS compliance. I see
two extremes;

i) Start with a full set of modules and update to OASIS compliance while
keeping all the function we have running
ii) Start with the smallest set of modules possible and iterate toward OASIS
compliance adding in more function/extensions as people address different
features/specifications.

Again, are there other approaches?

The object of this discussion is to agree the starting point for future
trunk development. If you don't have other options to add it would be useful
for you to express a preference so we can see what people think. If we can't
come to a conclusion in the next couple of days though this discussion we
will have to identify a small number of options to vote on.

Thanks

Simon

[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev%40tuscany.apache.org/msg03215.html

Reply via email to