Hi Wojtek, What would be the usage scenarios for each? How do you envision these new functionalities to be used? In what type of environment? They all sound interesting.
Haleh On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Wojtek Janiszewski < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > as some of you know I'm (still) in front of choosing subject of my master > thesis. I decided to connect it with Tuscany and I've picked three topics > which I'm interested in: > > > 1. Support for Styx protocol, which is used in operating systems like > Plan9 or Inferno. > > This extension could be realized as binding extension which could provide > access to Styx resources (reference bindings). Tuscany components could be > also served as Styx resources (service bindings). I thought I could use > JStyx which is Java Styx implementation [1]. Little challenge here could be > inventing method of mapping Java interface to structure of Styx resource > (tree). > > 2. Support for Erlang language (inspired by GSoC 2008 proposal). > > This one sounds interesting, but after reading [2] and [3] I'm still not > sure how this could work as implementation type in Tuscany. Can we assume > that input implementation file contains list of erl shell commands which > would be translated to JInterface calls? > > 3. Support for Map/Reduce - integration with Apache Hadoop (GSoC 2008 > proposal). > > It looks like this GSoC project wasn't finished successfully. Is it true? > If so then this project is also worth of more research. > > > I'll appreciate any comments. What do you think about usefulness of each > proposition? > > Thanks, > Wojtek > > [1] - http://www.resc.rdg.ac.uk/jstyx/index.html > [2] - http://wiki.apache.org/general/SummerOfCode2008#tuscany-erlang > [3] - > http://www.theserverside.com/tt/articles/article.tss?l=IntegratingJavaandErlang > >
