Hi Simon, I like your suggestion for the naming standards, +1 for implementing the same.
I will raise a JIRA to address the same. If any one has any comments, please let me know. Thanks. On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 8:41 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Dan Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> Hi Ram, >> >> Good scouting there. I think having a standard naming convention will >> increase usability and make it easy for users to become acclimated. I vote >> to proceed with implementing a standard naming convention. >> >> >> Ramkumar R wrote: >> >>> While running a complete build for sca-java-1.x branch, just noticed that >>> the names of projects in modules and itest are not uniform... for example >>> >>> While most of the projects start with a name "Apache Tuscany SCA", few >>> does >>> not comply to the standard..... as shown below. >>> >>> In sca/java/modules: >>> - Apache Tuscany Java Interface for JAXWS >>> - Apache Tuscany Security Policy Model >>> - Apache Tuscany Reliability Policy Model >>> - Apache Tuscany Policy Model for JMS binding >>> - Apache Tuscany Policy Model for Axis2 WS binding >>> - Apache Tuscany OSGi Runtime Helper Library >>> - Apache Tuscany AOP-based Logging and Tracing >>> - Apache Tuscany Logging Policy Model >>> - Apache Tuscany Data Binding for FastInfoset >>> >>> In sca/java/itest: >>> - Apache Tuscany Test for Callable References over Web Services >>> - Apache Tuscany Test for Simple Exceptions over Web Services >>> - Apache Tuscany Interface Integration Tests >>> - Unnamed - org.apache.tuscany.sca:itest-jms-args:jar:1.4-SNAPSHOT >>> - Apache Tuscany OSGi Contribution Version 2 classes >>> - Apache Tuscany OSGi Contribution Version 1 classes >>> - Apache Tuscany OSGi Contribution tests >>> - Apache Tuscany OSGi Contribution Tests >>> >>> Just wanted to confirm, if we are following a standard in naming the >>> projects? >>> >>> >> -- >> Thanks, Dan Becker >> > > +1 some of the names are either inconsistent or inaccurate so a tidy up > here would be good. E.g > > Apache Tuscany "ModuleName " > > Seems to be the kind of pattern that we have for modules. Would be good to > extend this so that samples, itests and demos are identifiable. > > Apache Tuscany itest "ModuleName " > Apache Tuscany sample "ModuleName " > Apache Tuscany demo "ModuleName " > > Simon > -- Thanks & Regards, Ramkumar Ramalingam
