On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:36 AM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:37 PM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> > >> Nice summary of the differences. I suggest that we add this list to a > wiki > >> page to track the merging efforts. I can start to comment on the > individual > >> modules on the wiki as soon as it appears. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Raymond > > > > ...snip > > > > Ok Raymond I can do that. I'd like to keep as much of the conversation > and > > progress statements on the list but I don't mind summarizing on the wiki > and > > then repeating the summary info here for all to see. I'll make a page and > > post again. > > > > More generally the merge looks doable to me. Although I do want to > > understand the more complex modules that I've mentioned. So we could > start > > by clearing the modules that are already in trunk/modules to > > /contrib/modules as has already been mentioned and bring back in the > minimum > > 40ish modules (combining the changes from the equinox branch with the > > current state of trunk) until we get the calculator-equinox working. > > > > +1 > > > If I understand correctly the people who've been working on the equinox > > branch are using new tooling modules also so any that are required will > have > > to be added in (I haven't tried any of the Eclipse integration in the > branch > > I just ran the mvn build, hence my comments on my previous post). It > would > > be good to get a description about what any new modules are individually > > responsible for also so that I can tie their function to the features on > > your OSGi enablement page > > ( > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/OSGi+Enablement+for+Tuscany+Runtime > ). > > > > +1 > > > Would also be good to get a tutorial of how you use Eclipse in this > context, > > e.g. precisely what steps do you go through to configure, load, edit and > > debug modules. Having said that I'm not ready to look at that just yet so > > not an emergency. I anticipate that I can just carry on using the > development > > approach I'm familiar with from the existing trunk while looking at the > > calcualtor-equinox bring up. > > > > The OSGI developer's guide [1] should have most of what you want. > Please feel free to ask questions if you see pieces missing and/or > find issues. Let's also keep it up to date based on progress on this > effort. > > [1] http://tuscany.apache.org/sca-java-development-guide-osgi.html > Ah splendid. I have to admit that I have actually looked at this page before but didn't notice the PDE "small print". I'll give it a spin some time and maybe extract some screen shots. > > > I think as we move forward it would be good to move samples and itests to > > contrib also so that we have a clear view of what works. Thoughts? > > > +1 > > > I can start to look at doing some of the merging. Is there anyone who can > > help out? > > > > Simon > > > > I can definitely help out. I'll start by working on the initial merge, > and will update this thread with my progress. Ok, great, I'm going to eat now and then work some more on looking at the meaning of the diffs so I'll catch up with you a little later. > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk > http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >
