This was a side effect of the changes that went in revision #718969 and moving to the latest version of the processor should help fix this issue.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > So, is it dead code that we should remove? > > Thanks, > Raymond > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Luciano Resende" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 9:48 AM > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: org.w3c.dom.traversal dependency for contribution-xml, was: Re: > 2.0 trunk modules status update > >> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I saw the same issue with org.w3c.dom.traversal package too. This package >>> is >>> not exported by the system bundle (while org.w3c.dom is). >>> >>> I also looked into the code. It was introduced as part of the "Any >>> Element" >>> processor to write the DOM into an XMLStreamWriter. Can we use a >>> different >>> algorithm to avoid this dependency? >>> >> >> This is probably the first version of the processor that was still >> using DOM. We can try to move to the new version and avoid this issue. >> >>> Thanks, >>> Raymond >>> > [[snip]] >> >> -- >> Luciano Resende >> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
