[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12673313#action_12673313
]
ant elder commented on TUSCANY-2848:
------------------------------------
Yes that sounds reasonable to me too. One thing though is we'll be breaking
backward compatibility which users may be relying on, we did have a user
complain when we changed this area in 1.4 -
http://apache.markmail.org/message/diehalz27tklk2gd and we had to fix it for
them, not sure if they were relying on using chained exceptions, i'll try to
find out
> Chained exceptions get lost when returning a checked exception with the JMS
> binding with text xml wire format
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-2848
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2848
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next
> Reporter: ant elder
>
> Chained exceptions get lost when returning a checked exception with the JMS
> binding with text xml wire format.
> It looks like the databinding framework is not including the cause
> information when converting from the checked exception to XML in an OMElement
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
