On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: > I think we do want to ship the Spring jars as part of the Tuscany > distribution. Simon was saying the same thing. > > Raymond > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "Mike Edwards" <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 11:20 AM > To: <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [2.x] Spring dependency > >> Simon Laws wrote: >>> >>> In the implementation-spring-sca pom the dependency on the Spring jars >>> is marked as provided. I can see that some people may want to run >>> Tuscany in a runtime where they are provided but for I distribution I >>> believe we will be shipping these jars. Also I need to generate the >>> PDE target so that Eclipse picks up these Jars at development time. >>> Anyone object to me changing these to a non-provided dependency? >>> >>> Simon >>> >> Folks, >> >> Why don't we want to ship the Spring classes, so that we have a single >> package that the end user can install? It is a pain having to fetch >> separate downloads from lots of different places. >> >> >> Yours, Mike. > > Yep, I was saying we should ship the Jars. I'll commit the change.
Simon
