On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Simon Laws<[email protected]> wrote: >> <component name="EPTest1"> >> <implementation.java class="helloworld.HelloWorldImpl"/> >> <service name="HelloWorldService" > >> <tuscany:binding.jsonp name="foo" /> >> </service> >> </component> >> >> INFO: Added Servlet mapping: >> http://IBM-B4ADCA311EA:8085/EPTest1/HelloWorldService > > The code is not using the binding name if there is only one binding. > Could be fixed by turning the binding name one when there is only one > binding and its name != service name > >> >> <component name="EPTest2"> >> <implementation.java class="helloworld.HelloWorldImpl"/> >> <service name="HelloWorldService" > >> <tuscany:binding.jsonp uri="bla"/> >> </service> >> </component> >> >> INFO: Added Servlet mapping: http://IBM-B4ADCA311EA:8085/EPTest2/bla > > Do we think it should have the service name also in the relative case? > Would seen more consistent given what's been said about when a name is > provided. >
Yes i think we should do those two things you've said above. After i've done the itest i'll make those changes unless any one objects. ...ant
