On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:03 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > >> However explicit words were put into >> the spec to apparently discount this at the domain leve. > > Are you referring to just the ones on line 3873 which Raymond pasted > in or are there other mentions somewhere else? > > ...ant >
No, just the ones Raymond pointed out. However I do remember some discussion with the OSOA scheme for composite services/references at the domain level and some issues that it causes. I think along the lines of what I was talking about in terms of having to send configuration down the promotion hierarchy instead of up it in this one case. Am looking for mail on this list discussing it but no luck yet. Simon
