Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE Response follows.
Gang > -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Nash [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 12:00 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Can application code and interceptor/handler code in > Tuscany communicate with each other via some context? (UNCLASSIFIED) > > Yang, Gang CTR US USA wrote: > > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > > Caveats: NONE > > > > (cut) > > > > Thanks! It's clear now. I looked up RequestContext (don't know why I > > missed it earlier). It does not seem to support general state > > propagation - I can set/get arbitrary objects. Can this be opened up > to > > allow arbitrary object states? > > > Tuscany can't add any methods to this API because it's defined by SCA. > > Tuscany could add some other API to propagate arbitrary state but this > would be a major departure from the philosophy of SCA and I would have > serious reservations about this. > > However, the Java ThreadLocal class should enable you to do what you > need. > You can add an object to Java thead-local state in your inbound > handler, > access or update this object (or add more objects) in your application > code, and use the results in your outbound handler. I'm not sure about using ThreadLocal in a service framework environment for component implementation or even user-added handlers since I don't know how the framework manages the threads. Gang > > Simon > > > Gang > > > >> Simon > >> > >>> Simon > >>> > >>> Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > >>> Caveats: NONE > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED > > Caveats: NONE > > > > > > > > Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Caveats: NONE
