On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Florian Moga <[email protected]> wrote: >> In my opinion, the getting-started samples would be enough for a release at >> the moment (they're in pretty good shape, few modifications will be needed). >> I'm still lost in our samples discussion so I've started a wiki page [1] to >> keep track of the requirements for a sample in order to make it to trunk. >> Please update it if I missed something so that we have a complete checklist >> for anyone wanting to work on the samples. >> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Tuscany+Samples+Requirements >> > > > First, we should really have much more explicit subjects when > discussing important items, particularly because lots of us tend to > start ignoring some huge threads with subjective subjects. > > As for the requirements to have samples in trunk, we always had the > ability to demonstrate different ways to do a particular thing (e.g > running in an embedded runtime, OSGi environment, running in different > types of WebApp containers, etc) and the requirement to run with the > shell might implicate some of these samples can't not be in trunk ? > > Also, on the wiki, could you please clarify what does the requirements > mean, give an example of what is expected, etc > > Thanks > > -- > Luciano Resende
If you really did ignore the long sample discussion then it might be good to go have a look now. I think we have reached a broad agreement and common understanding of what we'd like to do and most of the active devs participated. There is still work to do but thats more at the dotting the i's and crossing the t's level. ...ant
