On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Simon Nash <[email protected]> wrote: > Also in [1], I said that a new sample that doesn't yet meet the mandatory > release requirements should go in unreleased/ initially. AFAICT, the store > sample does meet the mandatory release requirements, so I'm not sure why > it was moved to unreleased/. >
Because without asking first there is no way of know if there is consensus with everyone to include something in trunk. I give up on this new approach to the samples, it is sucking away way to much time. Please from now on lets go back to trunk/samples working just the same as any other part of tuscany svn. ...ant
