On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Simon Nash <[email protected]> wrote:
> ant elder wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Simon Nash <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Raymond Feng wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Maven sometimes need to resolve the artifact to a range of versions or
>>>> the
>>>> LATEST. I think the versions in the XML will help in such cases.
>>>>
>>> Thanks for this explanation.  Any ideas on how I can get the other
>>> versions
>>> added back to these files?
>>>
>>
>> I'm not sure I understand whats happened, looking in the central repo
>> now the 1.6.2 release is there and the maven-metadata.xml includes the
>> old versions but not the 1.6.2 version, see
>> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/tuscany/sca/tuscany-assembly/
>>
>> I'd guess that most of the releases we do have used that cp command
>> approach so this must have happened before for all those other
>> releases and no one has complained.
>>
>>   ...ant
>>
>>
> Yes, that's strange as well but in the opposite way; the maven-metadata.xml
> there has all the older releases but is missing the newer ones (1.6.1,
> 1.6.2,
> 2.0-Beta1 and 2.0-Beta2).
>
> I'm going to go ahead and add the download page for 1.6.2 and send out the
> announcement.  If anyone reports any problems caused by these
> maven-metadata.xml
> discrepancies, we can address them at that time.
>
>  Simon
>
>

I think that's right Simon. I don't have anything technically useful
to add here but back in the day I did repeatedly struggle to use Maven
to deploy the released artifacts to the right place. At some point
(probably when the instructions were updated) I found that some RMs
were just copying up the artifacts and no one was complaining.

Regards

Simon

-- 
Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com

Reply via email to