On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:38 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> ...snip
>>>
>>> . The only other part of the file thats used by the
>>>> Shell/TuscanyRuntime is the domainURI attribute.
>>>>
>>>
>>> How are the binding base uris configured?
>>>
>>
>> I've not implemented anything for that. I'm not sure that having those
>> base URIs defined in this node xml is the correct approach, I'm not
>> sure the domain URI should be there either. It does seem useful to be
>> able to define a set of related contributions and their composites to
>> start - an application - but it doesn't seem so right to me to have
>> the same file configure things about the runtime environment like HTTP
>> ports, that doesn't even work in some environments like appservers or
>> webapps.
>>
>>   ...ant
>>
>
> We need some way to provide this information to the node. With some of
> the deployment environments the node is not able to determine it for
> itself.  We could have a separate file that includes node and domain
> wide configuration but that would mean having node specific
> configuration spread across more than one file. There are pros and
> cons of both.
>

What is it needed for? If its just for tests to set the http port to
default to 8085 instead of 8080 then there is a static field on the
http server class which tests can set.

   ...ant

Reply via email to