On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:31 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Issues 3: Given that callback endpoints are put into the registry >>> there is a danger that they will be mistakenly matched for forward >>> endpoint when just the component name is provided as input to the >>> match. >> >> For issue 3 about callback endpoints getting found in the registry by >> accident how about instead of tacking "Callback" on the service name >> put it on the component name? >> >> ...ant >> > > Do you mean in the xml that fluffed up when an endpoint is serialized? > If so yes, I agree, something like that would work. >
Thats not quite what i meant but i've just had a look and the code doesn't work the way it used to now so what i was thinking wont help. If we did more complete interface matching when picking an endpoint instead of just picking the first one would this issue go away? Didn't Greg raise a JIRA or post to the ML about doing that a little while back? ...ant
