[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13204341#comment-13204341
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3924:
-------------------------------------
I'm seeing the same Raymond. I don't think my approach is good so am about to
revert some of it. I had a chat offline with Mike Edwards and I think we need
to rethink the interpretation of the spec (which is not clear in this area) as
I'm feeling uncomfortable about the code ignoring base class information.
> Inherited fields in service impl classes are treated as Properties
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-3924
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3924
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java SCA Assembly Model
> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.x
> Reporter: Vijai Kalathur
> Assignee: Simon Laws
> Fix For: Java-SCA-2.x
>
>
> In the scenario where the Service impl class extends a class which has no SCA
> annotations in it, protected fields in the base class are interpreted like
> Properties.
> Ideally, only the fields in the impl class should be introspected for
> References/Properties. The fields in the base class should not be
> interpreted as References/Properties if there are no SCA annotations.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
