Also shouldn't Release note be changed? http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-Beta4-RC1/RELEASE_NOTES
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Nirmal Fernando <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi Ant, > > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:19 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:48 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Here's the release vote for RC1 of the 2.0-Beta4 artifacts, please >> >> review and vote. >> >> >> >> You can find the staged artifacts at: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/2.0-Beta4-RC1/ >> >> >> >> and the SVN tag for the release at: >> >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta4-RC1/ >> > > The SVN command (svn log -r 1151792:HEAD > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta4) in > the changes file should be corrected to svn log -r 1151792:HEAD > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/tags/2.0-Beta4-RC1 > > Isn't it? > > >> >> >> ...ant >> > >> > >> > Seems good, source distribution builds from a clean repo, run RAT and >> > things seems fine. >> > >> > +1 >> > >> >> Thanks Luciano. +1 from me too. >> >> ...ant >> > > > > -- > Best Regards, > Nirmal > > C.S.Nirmal J. Fernando > Software Engineer, > WSO2 Inc. > > Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/ > > -- Best Regards, Nirmal C.S.Nirmal J. Fernando Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. Blog: http://nirmalfdo.blogspot.com/
