On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 9:57 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ok well thanks for looking. I think we all knew there were issues with >> some samples, and we saw what happened with the beta1 release when we >> tried to sort all that out and it descended into unconstructiveness. I >> can fix some of those that you've pointed out, though i wont have much >> time for a little while, but there are some i'm not interested in. I'd >> have preferred to just release what we have quickly and fix things >> incrementally in more frequent releases but for now i'll wait a little >> while and see if we get any fixes made and then look at an RC2 in a >> week or two. >> >> ...ant >> > > Ok, well for a 2.0 release I think we should either fix or remove > stuff that doesn't work. I'll have some time but it's a bit sporadic > at the moment. >
Ok I'll look forward to you sporadic help. I will point out that we tried the approach you suggest with Beta2 and had a 100+ email grumpy thread when people didn't like samples getting taken out. With the help we have IMHO its better to get a release out soon than sit on it for months or years as its not perfect and this is the approach I'm going to take with the next RCs. ...ant
