Hi Prabath/Gokul,

According to hadoop documentation there doesn't seem to be any major
difference between the two releases [1] & [2].  However, 2.5.2 seems to
have fixed some critical issues of 2.5.1 [3] (which are not directly
mentioned), which is obviously carried out to 2.6.0. Since the datanode
carbonization is done on 2.5.1 code, I am not sure how feasible it is to
change it to 2.6.0, there seems to be improvements done on datanode code in
this release. Since we have a release in 2 weeks time, and me and Deep are
both working on tasks for this release, we could get someone from the team
to check the feasibility of moving to 2.6.0. WDYT?

[1] http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r2.5.1/
[2] http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable/
[3] http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r2.5.2/

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Gokul Balakrishnan <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi SS team,
>
> For BAM 3.0 Data Layer implementation, we're considering the use of the
> Hadoop 2.x Java API, to communicate with an external HDFS environment.
> However, the version currently being used in SS 2.0 work seems to be Hadoop
> 2.5.1 [1]. Since we won't be needing any multitenancy-related improvements
> done as part of SS dev work, should we use your version or proceed with the
> latest 2.6.0 jars for the Java API (as an orbit bundle), since it would be
> best if we're not tied to SS releases for version upgrades merely for the
> Java API. What do you suggest?
>
> [1] https://github.com/wso2-dev/wso2-hadoop
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> *Balakrishnan Gokulakrishnan*
> Software Engineer,
> WSO2, Inc. http://wso2.com
> Mob: +94 77 593 5789 | +1 650 272 9927
>



-- 
Thanks and Regards
*,Shani Ranasinghe*
Software Engineer
WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
lean.enterprise.middleware

mobile: +94 77 2273555
linked in: lk.linkedin.com/pub/shani-ranasinghe/34/111/ab
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to