Hi, I have been working on understanding more on the current SCIM 1.1 test suite. Hence I further analyzed it and identified the following possibilities.
1. Apart from the specification specific implementation aspects, a significant amount of code reuse can be done from the current code base. However as per the SCIM mailing list [1] some concerns were raised regarding the current structure of the implementation. 2. For the proposed scim core component, we can make use of the Charon [2] code base as a start. As Identity Server currently supports SCIM 2.0 in the C5 architecture only, I have added a PR [3] and a jira [4] to make it available for C4 architecture as well. Greatly appreciate if you can review it and merge. I am currently working in the webapp of the component architecture proposed and hoping to start implementing the scimcore component in the coming week. Apart from that, will look into mocking the /Schemas endpoint in the SCIM 1.1 implementation of Identity Server to get a better understanding on how the SCIM 1.1 test suite works with IS. [1] - https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/JYFpusDrtQ94hnghvEPjczU4laE [2] - https://github.com/wso2/charon [3] - https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-inbound-provisioning-scim2/pull/16 [4] - https://wso2.org/jira/projects/IDENTITY/issues/IDENTITY-5942 Thank you *Vindula Jayawardana* Computer Science and Engineering Dept. University of Moratuwa mobile : +713462554 Email : [email protected] <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "* *-Richard Branson-* On 2 April 2017 at 18:29, Vindula Jayawardana <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Omindu, > > Thank you for the prompt feedback on the draft proposal. I incorporated > the suggestions you made on the proposal. > > As also mentioned in the proposal, I made the configuration options more > flexible by giving the manual configuration feasibility to the tester as an > optional feature apart from what is mandatory in the project. I hope that > would give us the required flexibility in the SCIM 2.0 compliance test > suite in terms of configuration options. > > Thank you, > > *Vindula Jayawardana* > Computer Science and Engineering Dept. > University of Moratuwa > mobile : +713462554 > Email : [email protected] > > <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> > <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> > <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> > <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> > > *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "* > > > *-Richard Branson-* > > > > On 2 April 2017 at 17:08, Omindu Rathnaweera <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Will have a look Vindula. >> >> Thanks for putting an effort on running the 1.1 test. The intention >> behind it was to get a general idea on what to include in the 2.0 test >> suite and the areas to be improved. What you have obtained should be enough >> to understand the nature of the tests and basics information to be >> captured. I agree on the fact that the configuration options should be more >> flexible. Let's capture this in the project proposal if you haven't already. >> >> Regards, >> Omindu. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 1:26 PM, Vindula Jayawardana < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I shared my draft proposal in GSoC dashboard and I kindly request your >>> feedback in improving the proposal. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> *Vindula Jayawardana* >>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >>> University of Moratuwa >>> mobile : +713462554 >>> Email : [email protected] >>> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >>> >>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. >>> "* >>> >>> >>> *-Richard Branson-* >>> >>> >>> >>> On 30 March 2017 at 23:13, Vindula Jayawardana <[email protected] >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> As mentioned above, I looked at the SCIM 1.1 compliance test suite >>>> [1]. Due to the reason that the SCIM 1.1 test suite requires an internet >>>> facing SCIM 1.1 server to run the tests against, I setup-ed an Identity >>>> Server instance in AWS [2]. However when the test are run, it fails due to >>>> /ServiceProviderConfigs and /Schemas endpoints. As WSO2 SCIM 1.1 support >>>> [3] is not covering the mentioned two endpoints, tests are >>>> failing when run. >>>> >>>> However in order to get an idea on how the result representation had >>>> been done in SCIM 1.1 compliance test suit, I mocked the >>>> /ServiceProviderConfigs endpoint [4] and was able to get the >>>> following output. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Due to the complexity of mocking the /Schemas endpoint and also as the >>>> test on one endpoint ( /ServiceProviderConfigs) could give the nature >>>> of the result representation as seen above, I did not try to mock /Schemas >>>> endpoint and run the test suit again. However I tried by mocking the >>>> endpoint with 501 NOT IMPLEMENTED [5] as the output, but that was not >>>> accepted by the test suit as a valid return object. >>>> >>>> However, in my opinion, the SCIM test suit should be flexible in nature >>>> to skip any test which was given the input from the SCIM server as 501 NOT >>>> IMPLEMENTED [5]. I encourage such kind of implementation to be adopted in >>>> the proposed SCIM 2.0 compliance test suit as in that way the test suit >>>> acknowledges the SP's inability to provide those endpoints while making >>>> sure such kind of inability does not compromise the ability to run the test >>>> suit on other endpoints. >>>> >>>> [1] - http://www.simplecloud.info/#complianceTest >>>> [2] - https://aws.amazon.com/ >>>> [3] - https://github.com/wso2/charon/tree/release-2.0.7 >>>> [4] - https://github.com/Vindulamj/mocked-identity-inbound-provi >>>> sioning-scim/tree/master/identity-inbound-provisioning-scim-master >>>> [5] - http://www.simplecloud.info/specs/draft-scim-api-01.html#anchor6 >>>> >>>> *Vindula Jayawardana* >>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >>>> University of Moratuwa >>>> mobile : +713462554 >>>> Email : [email protected] >>>> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >>>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >>>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >>>> >>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. >>>> "* >>>> >>>> >>>> *-Richard Branson-* >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10 March 2017 at 16:42, Vindula Jayawardana < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Thank you very much for the prompt replies. I will look into the >>>>> points you have mentioned and will keep you updated here. >>>>> >>>>> Thank you. >>>>> >>>>> *Vindula Jayawardana* >>>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >>>>> University of Moratuwa >>>>> mobile : +713462554 >>>>> Email : [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >>>>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >>>>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >>>>> >>>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to >>>>> impress. "* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *-Richard Branson-* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 9 March 2017 at 21:22, Omindu Rathnaweera <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Vindula, >>>>>> >>>>>> If we can run the existing 1.1 test on IS and see the generated >>>>>> output, that will be a good point to start. However we'll need to host an >>>>>> IS instance publicly to run the tests on it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Omindu. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Gayan Gunawardana <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Vindula, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for your interest in this project. >>>>>>> Since you have good knowledge about SCIM 2.0 specifications, could >>>>>>> you please look at SCIM 1.1 compliance test and source code [1]. SCIM >>>>>>> 2.0 >>>>>>> compliance test doesn't need to be same as SCIM 1.1 just get an idea >>>>>>> from >>>>>>> SCIM 1.1 compliance test. Further you can extract test scenarios from >>>>>>> [2] >>>>>>> as well. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [1]https://github.com/erdtman/simplecloud.info >>>>>>> <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ferdtman%2Fsimplecloud.info&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNGycfiBxzWbdCVjpGlABAw9OXxGaQ> >>>>>>> [2]https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-inbound-provi >>>>>>> sioning-scim2/tree/master/tests >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> Gayan >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Vindula Jayawardana < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am Vindula Jayawardana, a final year undergraduate of Computer >>>>>>>> Science and Engineering Department of University of Moratuwa. I am >>>>>>>> interested in applying for the "Proposal 21: [IS] SCIM 2.0 >>>>>>>> compliance test suite" which you have offered for the GSoC project idea >>>>>>>> pool. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have a good understanding on SCIM core and protocol >>>>>>>> specifications for both SCIM 1.1 and SCIM 2.0. Based on my knowledge I >>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>> written few blog posts specifically catering on SCIM [1] and the use >>>>>>>> cases >>>>>>>> of SCIM [2]. Also I have tried SCIM 1.1 and 2.0 APIs of wso2 IS. I went >>>>>>>> though the references provided and would like to know more on the >>>>>>>> scope of the coverage report and detailed analysis view need to be >>>>>>>> generated as a deliverable. Could you kindly guide me on the said >>>>>>>> matter. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] - https://medium.com/@vindulajayawardana/scim-make-it-fast-che >>>>>>>> ap-and-easy-b2bd56492c15#.ec1kncbde >>>>>>>> [2] - https://medium.com/@vindulajayawardana/5-things-that-will-no >>>>>>>> t-be-a-nightmare-anymore-if-you-support-scim-9353d73836a7#.i >>>>>>>> hcm9aqub >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Vindula Jayawardana* >>>>>>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >>>>>>>> University of Moratuwa >>>>>>>> mobile : +713462554 >>>>>>>> Email : [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >>>>>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >>>>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >>>>>>>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to >>>>>>>> impress. "* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *-Richard Branson-* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Gayan Gunawardana >>>>>>> Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/ >>>>>>> Email: [email protected] >>>>>>> Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933 >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Omindu Rathnaweera >>>>>> Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. >>>>>> Mobile: +94 771 197 211 <+94%2077%20119%207211> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Omindu Rathnaweera >> Senior Software Engineer, WSO2 Inc. >> Mobile: +94 771 197 211 <+94%2077%20119%207211> >> > >
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
