On 29/01/2013 16:38, Alex Keybl wrote:
Why are you going to delete the nightly branch? gaia-master is the equivalent 
of mozilla-inbound and gaia-nightly is the equivalent of mozilla-central. Are 
you going to delete mozilla-central as well? :)
We were under the impression that the nightly branch caused a lot of overhead 
and some landing lag, since testing that branch prior to merging is a manual 
job.
The lag for landing is expected but I feel like it could be reduce if there were more sheriffs. Nobody wants this responsibility right now because it force you to run a set of tests manually so overhead is a consequence of the lack of automation tests. This should hopefully be resolved by https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=813301

It seemed as if master would be an appropriate place to do "nightly" equivalent 
work prior to uplift to v1-train/v1.x branches.

If that's not the case, engineering can feel free to continue using it. I'm just curious 
which repo below "nightly" would feed into.

v1.0.0 - as named
v1-train - tip of v1.x, currently v1.0.1
master - v2 (but can also include future v1 feature work)

I think you should s/master/nightly/ here. Nightly will be fed by master as usual. As I suggest most of the confusion seems to come from naming but master should never be considered as a safe branch. Use at your own risk.

Vivien.


-Alex

On Jan 29, 2013, at 7:16 AM, Vivien <[email protected]> wrote:

On 28/01/2013 23:51, John Ford wrote:
Hello,

We are deprecating the nightly branch of both Gaia and b2g-manifest (repo 
manifests).  The nightly branch will be superseded by the v1-train branch of 
both Gaia and b2g-manifest.  We will be deleting the nightly branch in the near 
future.
Why are you going to delete the nightly branch? gaia-master is the equivalent 
of mozilla-inbound and gaia-nightly is the equivalent of mozilla-central. Are 
you going to delete mozilla-central as well? :)

We learned a lot on the field in the past, please does not regress things and 
put us back in a state where it is impossible for devs to provide a stable 
build and for QA to give a reasonable changesets. v1-train is one things but 
for all the people that are going to work on 2.0 features they should expect to 
have a stable branch is possible. If that's just a naming question we can 
rename master to inbound...

  There will also be a v1.0.0 branch of both repositories for the work tracking 
our 1.0.0 release.

The new default branch to pull in B2G's config.sh script is 'v1-train'.  If 
you're currently on the nightly branch and would like to be on the supported 
v1-train branch, you can pull updates to your top level B2G repository and 
rerun ./config.sh. An example to do this would be:

$ cd B2G
$ git fetch origin && git merge origin/master
$ ./config.sh <device>

This will set up your repo tree and do a repo sync with the new branches.  In 
an effort to reduce confusion, here is the mappings between the BRANCH value 
passed to config.sh and the branches of Gecko and Gaia you'll end up with:

* "BRANCH=master ./config.sh" will yield an ancient copy [1] of Gecko's 
'master' branch (mozilla-central) and Gaia's 'master' branch
I feel strongly against that. This is bringing Chaos back. What are the 
rationale to not use the nightly branch?

* "BRANCH=v1-train ./config.sh" will yield Gecko's 'gecko-18' (mozilla-b2g18) 
branch and Gaia's 'v1-train' branch
* "BRANCH=v1.0.0 ./config.sh" will yield Gecko's 'v1.0.0' branch and Gaia's 
'v1.0.0' branch

If you have more questions about branching or about what code ends up where, 
there is a helpful wiki page that's maintained by our Release Management team 
at https://wiki.mozilla.org/Release_Management/B2G_Landing that explains B2G 
branching in more detail.  If you still have questions, please feel free to ask 
me.

Thanks,

John Ford

[1] for info, see https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=820955.  If you 
want to work on mozilla-central, it's probably best to manage your own m-c tree 
and use GECKO_PATH in .userconfig
_______________________________________________
dev-gaia mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-gaia

_______________________________________________
dev-b2g mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g

Reply via email to