Hi Everyone,

Our B2G QA team has put together a short wiki that summarizes how we will triage incoming requests for QA support here - https://wiki.mozilla.org/B2G/QA/Triage. This document aims to clarify what keywords to use in what situation, how the QA contact field is used, and our different triage queries we use by urgency for addressing QA requests. Some areas from this documentation that's worth noting includes the following:

 * For QA requests, aim to use one of the keywords specified in the
   wiki that best represents the request being made. Need STR on a bug?
   Use steps-wanted. Need a regression window? Use
   regressionwindow-wanted. Need specialized QA support that doesn't
   fit any QA keyword? Use qawanted.
 * The QA contact field should optimally aim to be set by the QA
   intending to be working on the bug. Two exceptions on this rule
   include:
     o When there is a known default owner on the bugs (e.g. I test
       calendar bugs), a default QA contact is defined and used by
       default for QA requests
     o When there is a high need to find an owner on a bug during
       blocking triage, the QA representative in triage should be set
       as the QA contact to find an owner to look at the bug. If there
       is no representative in triage, then the QA contact field should
       be set to either Naoki (Gaia), Geo (Platform), or myself (Apps)
       based on the specific area the bug falls into.
 * We address QA requests by order of three buckets - bugs that are
   blocking? or blocking+, bugs that are blocking-, and any other bug.

If you have any questions, comments, feedback on this process, please feel free to let our team know.

--
Sincerely,
Jason Smith

Desktop QA Engineer
Mozilla Corporation
https://quality.mozilla.com

_______________________________________________
dev-b2g mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g

Reply via email to