Hi Lucas,

Talking about priorities. I just joined the community and I am trying to figure 
out something to pick up. I was looking around on Bugzilla (Gaia:polish). It 
seems a couple of them are marked as new but on GitHub were already closed. 
Also it's really hard to define the priorities. Can you give me a light please? 

Thanks,

On Tuesday, 9 April 2013 02:22:21 UTC+1, Lucas Adamski  wrote:
> = 1.1/LEO priorities =
> 
> 
> 
> There are three kinds of bugs on the LEO+ list:
> 
> 
> 
> 1) Uncompleted features - those are #1 priority for LEO
> 
> 2) Bugs that block partner milestones.  The current big one is partner CS, 
> and those bugs are being tracked under "Blocking partner CS" here: 
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/B2G/Triage#1.1.0_.28Leo.29
> 
> 3) Bugs that Mozilla has marked as LEO+ because we believe they must be fixed 
> before we ship.  These do not have an explicit deadline yet, but we should 
> expect that partners will also consider many of these to be blocking their 
> milestones and as such we should knock these down ASAP.
> 
> 
> 
> = Overall priorities =
> 
> 1.1 aside, we are NOT done with 1.0.1!  The sooner we wrap up 1.0.1, the 
> sooner we can focus 100% on 1.1!
> 
> 
> 
> General engineering priorities are:
> 
> a) reviews for TEF+ bugs
> 
> b) patches for TEF+ bugs
> 
> c) reviews and patches for LEO+ features
> 
> d) reviews and patches for LEO+ CS and other certification bugs
> 
> e) reviews and patches for other LEO+ bugs
> 
> g) tracking-b2g18+ and UX most wanted: 
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=ux-most-wanted
> 
> h) I doubt you'll get this far?
> 
> 
> 
> If you aren't working on a) though g), please consider whether you are using 
> your time as wisely as you could.  There is almost certainly something on 
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/B2G/Triage that you can help with.
> 
> 
> 
> = Landing patches =
> 
> - If you need to land something for 1.0.1, it needs to be marked TEF+.  Only 
> our partners can set that now past CC.
> 
> - If you need to land something for 1.1, it needs to be either LEO+ or you 
> need to ask for patch approval.  Approval requests do NOT require 
> tracking-b2g18+.  If you feel like your approval requests are not being 
> addressed in a timely manner, please reach out the Alex Keybl. We are still 
> handling blocking and landing approvals, and unlike 1.0.1 Mozilla will 
> continue to do so for non CS blocking bugs at least until the end of CS.
> 
> Details: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Release_Management/B2G_Landing
> 
> 
> 
> = Milestones =
> 
> An important note on work, life and milestones: milestones are thresholds 
> that determine the schedule for us and our partners, but the dates can change 
> as our understanding of market needs and product readiness evolves.  Missing 
> a milestone should be considered a schedule-impactful event.  Scope changes 
> in turn should impact milestones, which impact schedules.
> 
> 
> 
> Hitting a milestones unfortunately does not imply an immediate reduction in 
> our workload.  Please pick a cadence that you can maintain and don't kill 
> yourself trying to hit a milestone, as you will immediately face another (if 
> slightly different) climb.  Estimate how long you think things will really 
> take, and please provide those your manager to ensure we are estimating work 
> with the human factors included, vs. per some sort of idealized "work-week 
> output".
> 
> 
> 
> = Summary of useful links =
> 
> Links to things to work on: https://wiki.mozilla.org/B2G/Triage
> 
> Landing criteria: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Release_Management/B2G_Landing
> 
> Perf graphs: https://datazilla.mozilla.org/b2g/
> 
> - TEF+ bugs: http://bit.ly/16JZ6rQ
> 
> - LEO+ CS bugs: http://bit.ly/10MBelE
> 
> - LEO+ bugs: http://mzl.la/100cFkt
> 
> UX most wanted: 
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=ux-most-wanted

_______________________________________________
dev-b2g mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g

Reply via email to