-----Message d'origine-----
De : [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] De la part de 
[email protected]
Envoyé : mercredi 12 juin 2013 21:00
À : [email protected]
Objet : dev-b2g Digest, Vol 23, Issue 22

Send dev-b2g mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: 
Contents of dev-b2g digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re:  Proposal for Infrastructure to help out RIL Builds
      (Gareth Aye)
   2.   Problem with sim card (Shao Hang Kao)
   3. Re:  Problem with sim card (Alexandre Lissy)
   4. Re:  Problem with sim card (Shao Hang Kao)
   5. Re:  Problem with sim card (Hubert Figui?re)
   6. Re:  Problem with sim card (Alexandre Lissy)
   7.  Need Release Management attention on a bug? Use 'needinfo?'
      (Lukas Blakk)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:23:24 -0700
From: Gareth Aye <[email protected]>
To: Tony Chung <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected], Jason Smith <[email protected]>,
        "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
        [email protected], [email protected],
        [email protected]
Subject: Re: [b2g] Proposal for Infrastructure to help out RIL Builds
Message-ID:
        <CA+9qnVx6+Y4w2wdJ2PgrD19_CegVTmRwf12B_Ay6BQ-=6_v...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Thanks for the reality check Jason && Tony :). I don't think I knew how 
resource-constrained QA was and I just figured this might help bridge what 
seems like a pretty big divide between eng and QA.

While we're on the topic, I would really appreciate if someone from QA wouldn't 
mind giving an intro to FFOS QA at some point. I'm clearly pretty clueless 
about what you guys are up to and I think I'm maybe not the only one? Some of 
us are very interested in adding more automated, integration-level tests to 
Gaia and it'd be nice if we could work together!


On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Tony Chung <[email protected]> wrote:

> To add to jason's points,  It's absolutely too much overhead for my 
> team to smoketest each checkin.  The only feasible way is having automated 
> tests
> that run per checkin.   This is worth discussing with the A-team / Gaia UI
> team if that is feasible, and in what time frame.
>
> our current QA team does write automated tests, but it currently 
> supports
> 1.01 smoketests and we havent gotten around to testing new features.  
> We're still one build behind and can't catch up current release fast enough 
> for
> this.   We would request the help of gaia dev in this effort.    (device
> level testing is better, but maybe running on desktop build is good 
> enough)
>
> The other condition you need is parallelizing gecko changes as gaia
> changes land.   I know some checkins are independent of gecko, but some
> aren't and require parallel landings.    To test end to end infra per
> checkin, you'd need to sync up landings with gecko.   At least within 24
> hours i suppose.   This means if we sync master, we'll have to sync
> mozilla-central as well, to truly get integration testing going.
>
> Tony
>
> On Jun 11, 2013, at 3:22 PM, Jason Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  The one problem I have with this proposal is that this sounds like 
> this is proposing to do smoke test runs on every single pull request. 
> That's likely going to be too much overhead for our smoke test management.
>
>
>
> For patch-specific testing, usually the reviewer handles doing the 
> code review of the patch and manually testing the patch to ensure that 
> the patch does what it intends to do and that the patch does not cause 
> severe regressions. However, there are times when there is value to 
> get QA involved on the specific patch (e.g. complex patch that has 
> high regression risk). In those cases, I think there's value to 
> following a process such as what's you've specified below to generate 
> a try build with the pull request and ask for QA support to do testing 
> around the patch to check for regressions, ensure the patch does it was says 
> it should do, etc.
>
> I think there's a bug on file to add support for Gaia try builds to 
> implement this. Note that QA can manually generate a custom Gaia build 
> to follow the try build testing process right now, although having the 
> automated try build process would definitely make this process easier 
> to execute.
>
> Sincerely,
> Jason Smith
>
> Firefox OS QA Engineer
> Mozilla Corporationhttps://quality.mozilla.com
>
> On 6/11/2013 3:06 PM, Gareth Aye wrote:
>
>   Hi Everyone!
>
>  I wanted to propose an idea for how we can make the RIL builds more 
> relevant for and accessible to developers. Let me begin by saying that 
> I truly appreciate the work that QA does and that I do personally read 
> through all of the smoketest build results to see whether there are 
> any regressions my work has introduced. I think it's a great resource! 
> This is simply one idea for how we could make it an even better one.
>
>  I believe (and I think others would agree) that tests are most useful 
> when a patch is submitted for review. When I do a code review, I like 
> to see the linter and test results alongside the patch to get a full 
> perspective. Travis is actually *much* more useful to me than TBPL 
> because Travis tells me how patches affect things when it matters 
> most: when I'm reading code and deciding whether a patch is ready to 
> land. Imagine how many things we wouldn't have broken if reviewers 
> knew (when they accepted
> patches) whether or not they were breaking the smoketests!
>
>  So, without further adieu, I propose that we do just that! Let's run 
> the smoketests on pull requests!
>
> There's a catch though -- we have a very small QA team and there are
> *lots* of pull requests. It's totally reasonable to question whether 
> this is possible. It's my opinion that with some clever automation we 
> could make the volume of QA work totally manageable. In broad strokes...
>
>  1. GitHub sends a notification to our service-x to tell us that a 
> pull request has been opened against mozilla-b2g/gaia.
>  2. service-x parses from the pull request information which bugzilla 
> issue the pull request is trying to fix.
>  3. service-x parses from the pull request which smoketests would be 
> affected by the patch.
>  4. service-x fetches the bug from bugzilla and parses out the 
> environment (ie gaia version and gecko version) that the patch is 
> intended to be applied to.
>  5. service-x cherry picks the patch onto the appropriate gaia branch 
> and builds b2g.
>  6. service-x sends a notification (maybe an email?) to qa with a link 
> to download the build, the smoketests that need to be run, and a link 
> to the pull request to comment on with the result of the smoketests.
>
>  I think if we built a service-x, it would make the amount of work 
> that qa needed to do in order to provide smoketest results to all of 
> the pull requests manageable. The manual work would be minimized to 
> flashing a build to a device, running only the affected smoketests, 
> and commenting on a GitHub issue.
>
>  Any thoughts :) ?
>
>  --
>  Best,
> Gareth
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qa-b2g mailing 
> [email protected]https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/qa-b2g
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> B2g-release-drivers mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/b2g-release-drivers
>
>
>


--
Best,
Gareth


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:02:01 +0800
From: Shao Hang Kao <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [b2g]  Problem with sim card
Message-ID:
        <can03smnag+xh7tvyokz0ybrymcp8kkndyfqtwjbxdngpuhu...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hello!

I'm having problem that sim card not working on my Inari, it worked with
same sim card when I just got this phone with built in software (but I
can't remember the version).

I just fetch the latest code today (from B2G repository with custom gecko
or latest mozilla-central) and deployed to the device, everything works
fine except cellular stuff (from the settings I got the message 'Unknown
SIM card state')

I'm not sure if it's a bug or something wrong with my build configurations?
(I've attached the .userconfig I used, should I enable something to make it
work?)

Also attached some RIL logs, not sure if it helps.

Anyone have same situation before?

Thanks!

S.H.

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 10:08:37 +0200
From: Alexandre Lissy <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [b2g] Problem with sim card
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Le 12/06/2013 10:02, Shao Hang Kao a ?crit :
> Hello!
> 
> I'm having problem that sim card not working on my Inari, it worked with
> same sim card when I just got this phone with built in software (but I
> can't remember the version).
> 
> I just fetch the latest code today (from B2G repository with custom gecko
> or latest mozilla-central) and deployed to the device, everything works
> fine except cellular stuff (from the settings I got the message 'Unknown
> SIM card state')
> 
> I'm not sure if it's a bug or something wrong with my build configurations?
> (I've attached the .userconfig I used, should I enable something to make it
> work?)
> 
> Also attached some RIL logs, not sure if it helps.

Seems like you forgot the attachment :)

Do you have an IMEI set in your device ? Colleagues here with an Inari
which has 0 as IMEI are having similar issues with french network, and I
get the same with my Leo (also IMEI 0).

> 
> Anyone have same situation before?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> S.H.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dev-b2g mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
> 



------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 23:53:25 +0800
From: Shao Hang Kao <[email protected]>
To: Alexandre Lissy <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [b2g] Problem with sim card
Message-ID:
        <CAN03SMNvVSLh=jjmg3lcnxhowof8tj1g6zys7jfxmqfmcie...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

(not sure if my previous post get posted succesfully)

I see empty string on IMEI from settings, does it means 0?

If so how do I set IMEI for Inari?

Thanks!

S.H.


2013/6/12 Alexandre Lissy <[email protected]>

> Le 12/06/2013 10:02, Shao Hang Kao a ?crit :
> > Hello!
> >
> > I'm having problem that sim card not working on my Inari, it worked with
> > same sim card when I just got this phone with built in software (but I
> > can't remember the version).
> >
> > I just fetch the latest code today (from B2G repository with custom gecko
> > or latest mozilla-central) and deployed to the device, everything works
> > fine except cellular stuff (from the settings I got the message 'Unknown
> > SIM card state')
> >
> > I'm not sure if it's a bug or something wrong with my build
> configurations?
> > (I've attached the .userconfig I used, should I enable something to make
> it
> > work?)
> >
> > Also attached some RIL logs, not sure if it helps.
>
> Seems like you forgot the attachment :)
>
> Do you have an IMEI set in your device ? Colleagues here with an Inari
> which has 0 as IMEI are having similar issues with french network, and I
> get the same with my Leo (also IMEI 0).
>
> >
> > Anyone have same situation before?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > S.H.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev-b2g mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev-b2g mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
>


------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:58:52 -0400
From: Hubert Figui?re <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [b2g] Problem with sim card
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On 12/06/13 04:02 AM, Shao Hang Kao wrote:
> I just fetch the latest code today (from B2G repository with custom gecko
> or latest mozilla-central) and deployed to the device, everything works
> fine except cellular stuff (from the settings I got the message 'Unknown
> SIM card state')

I'm getting the same thing with the 1.1 PVT build from June 12.

It was "somewhat" working with 1.0.1.

I have an IMEI set to 0. It was set to something with 1.0.1.

I filed this bug:

  https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=882174

Will revert to 1.0.1

Hub


------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 18:28:21 +0200
From: Alexandre Lissy <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [b2g] Problem with sim card
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Le 12/06/2013 17:58, Hubert Figui?re a ?crit :
> On 12/06/13 04:02 AM, Shao Hang Kao wrote:
>> I just fetch the latest code today (from B2G repository with custom gecko
>> or latest mozilla-central) and deployed to the device, everything works
>> fine except cellular stuff (from the settings I got the message 'Unknown
>> SIM card state')
> 
> I'm getting the same thing with the 1.1 PVT build from June 12.
> 
> It was "somewhat" working with 1.0.1.
> 
> I have an IMEI set to 0. It was set to something with 1.0.1.

So this would be consistent with he behavior we have on other devices,
like Leo for myself.

> 
> I filed this bug:
> 
>   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=882174
> 
> Will revert to 1.0.1
> 
> Hub
> _______________________________________________
> dev-b2g mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
> 



------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 10:21:57 -0700
From: Lukas Blakk <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
        "[email protected] ()" <[email protected]>,
        "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,      dev-b2g
        <[email protected]>
Subject: [b2g] Need Release Management attention on a bug? Use
        'needinfo?'
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Hi All,

If you need to get release management input on a bug and don't have a 
preference for which of us (Alex, Lukas, Bhavanna, and soon Preeti) you get 
input from, then please do set a need-info? on our Release Management 
[:release-mgmt]  Bugzilla account.

This will reach all of us simultaneously and help us see your batsignal sooner 
rather than later.

Cheers
Lukas

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
dev-b2g mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g


End of dev-b2g Digest, Vol 23, Issue 22
***************************************
_______________________________________________
dev-b2g mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g

Reply via email to