Le 30/07/2013 17:25, Tony Chung a écrit : > On Jul 30, 2013, at 8:13 AM, Julien Wajsberg <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Le 23/07/2013 08:58, Tim Chien a écrit : >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Do we need to support Gaia master + b2g18? If memory serves me right, >>> I remember we don't have to support this kind of combination, but I >>> would like to get a hard confirmation on this. Thanks. >>> >> I already asked this question several times, and the same answer has >> been given since then: no we don't need to support this. >> >> Still, some people (including me) are still using this combination >> because it makes it easier to develop on Gaia, and there has been >> (limited) efforts to make this combination work. > Isnt it better to fix the problems now, and get more developers onto > master/m-c as soon as possible? if you guys encounter issues that is > blocking development, this should raise the urgency to fix it. i feel that > working in a unsupported development like master/b2g18 is only going to > create fragmentation and not give attention to fixing the environment we want. > > FWIW, our QA team is actively testing against master/m-c, and filing bugs > furiously to get this branch stable. I really suggest devs work in the > environment also so we can iron out those kinks soon than later. Also, > releng, a-team, and other supporting cast are all focused on working in > master/m-c; not master/b2g18.
ok, maybe I'm too paranoid and now is a good time to switch to master/m-c. Thanks Tony
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dev-b2g mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
