On 10/29/2013 12:45 PM, Dave Hunt wrote:
If the results we're gathering are proving useful then I would say we
should continue to keep a couple of these devices attached and running
the tests for now. We can always revisit this again when we have a need
for testing another device, but I would say we're unlikely to want to
maintain running tests for several different devices at once.
Do we have an alternative method for detecting hardware specific bugs?
I would think over time we would be adding more devices instead of
unifying to a single device. I could see a core device where we run
tests frequently and then secondary devices that run perhaps once a day
or something, but I wouldn't think we would want to remove those devices
completely.
Thanks!
Ben
Dave
On 10/29/13 4:31 PM, Ben Kelly wrote:
On 10/18/2013 10:04 AM, Ben Kelly wrote:
On 10/18/2013 04:15 AM, Dave Hunt wrote:
This is a notification that the performance testing on Unagi (links
below) was stopped this week in favour of Hamachi and Inari. Once we're
satisfied with the reliability of Hamachi we intent to drop Inari too.
Please let me know if you have any concerns.
Thanks for the heads up Dave!
Just out of curiousity, why are we dropping inari? Isn't that also a
shipping platform we need to support?
For example, bocoup was asking today in the gaia meeting about scroll
performance on inari that doesn't seem to effect the other platforms.
If we're only measuring hamachi, I'm worried we're going to miss this
kind of stuff.
Thanks again.
Ben
--
*Dave Hunt*
QA, Mozilla Corporation
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
dev-b2g mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
