This is all very encouraging while I expect a zte open any day now but I'm sure I'm not the only masochist :) I followed this list for a while now and at one point I started asking myself, why did Mozilla choose getting involved with geeksphone/zte/etc. for dedicated not_working/unavailable phones instead of bringing this OS to maturity on existing hardware; call that a generic OS which is easily ported to available phones that people actually have instead of making them buy new "developer devices" which suck one way or another. Cyanogenmod was ported to countless devices...
On Thursday, November 28, 2013 6:34:36 PM UTC+2, Daniel Dressler wrote: > I know what you mean about the ZTE Open, my flashing efforts have left > > it with an infinite boot time. In comparison an old nexus s got > > flashed without problem. Downside being it appears that the nexus s is > > holding value better than one would expect from such an old phone: > > http://swappa.com/buy/nexus-s-google/us > > > > Daniel > > > > 2013/11/28 Stephan Bardubitzki <[email protected]>: > > > After having paid for the Geekphone Peak+ in July and accepting two delays, > > > I had to learn today that this device is canceled. Instead Geekphone is now > > > working on a multi OS device, however, this is not what I was looking for. > > > (not to mention that I lost trust in GF) > > > > > > I need a FFOS device where I can easily flash the latest images on, but the > > > ZTE Open I own is, as many have already mentioned, not a device to do so. > > > > > > I recognize that this is not a Mozilla issue, but what alternatives do > > > developers have to do more serious development and testing on a real > > > devices? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Stephan > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > dev-b2g mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g _______________________________________________ dev-b2g mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
