I'd like to share some changes to the release milestones for B2G 2.0. Our 
intention is to get to a predictable release schedule with a defined path to 
shutdown development of a release. Additional work will happen to define the 
General Availability (GA) milestone and how we can effectively work with our 
partners to support their test cycles while meeting Mozilla's needs to work on 
newer releases.

I know that we've been through a number of milestone/schedule changes in the 
past. This naturally begs the question why will this time be different? We have 
put in place tracking and criteria in order to have meaningful conversations 
about the progress of the release early and often. (These conversations will 
happen at least weekly starting at week 2 in the cycle.) The point of these 
conversations is to identify issues and take corrective action early.

Below is the short version of the milestone definitions and a link to the 
longer version on the wiki. There is also a simple mapping of previous 
milestones and how they roughly map to the 2.0 milestones.


The short version:
FEATURE LANDING (FL)
6 weeks after development starts
all feature work must be complete by the this date
this milestone marks the beginning of the stabilization phase of the release

STRING FREEZE
target is FL with minimal string changes landing after FL

FEATURE COMPLETE (FC)
target 6 weeks after FL
hard cut off for feature work FL exceptions
requires QA sign-off
indicates the build is ready for chipset vendor testing

CODE COMPLETE (CC)
target 6 weeks after FC
zero blockers left from Mozilla and chipset vendors
indicates the build is ready for OEM/ODM testing


The longer version:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Release_Management/FirefoxOS/Release_Milestones


Rough mapping of previous milestones:
2.0 FL = 1.4 FC
2.0 FC = 1.4 RTP
2.0 CC = 1.4 CF
2.0 GA = 1.4 TA


Please respond to dev-b2g with questions.

Lawrence
_______________________________________________
dev-b2g mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g

Reply via email to