On 8 Aug 2014, at 06:32, Marek Raida <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you for your reply. It is new and interesting fact for me, that Flame > is not to be fully supported for lower than v2.0 OS, so I can stop reporting > bugs on 1.3 and focus on 2.0 instead. Well, once I'll be able to flash it to > my device, that's it :-( > However, what you're saying is in minor contradiction to what Chris writes on > linked Flame page - you're providing binaries for latest builds on FTP, even > for v1.4 > But if it is recommended to rather avoid 1.4 on Flame, perhaps Chris can > mention it there, make it not so obvious option to try 1.4. > For most people, trying the next major release is tempting because of higher > stability, but as you say, not so in case of Flame and v1.4
Yes - I’d love clarification on this, as it is different to what I thought was the case ;-) _______________________________________________ dev-b2g mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
