----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim Chien" <[email protected]>
> To: "Fabrice Desré" <[email protected]>
> Cc: "dev-b2g" <[email protected]>, "qa-b2g" <[email protected]>, 
> "Jonas Sicking" <[email protected]>,
> "Andreas Gal" <[email protected]>, "Al Tsai" <[email protected]>, "Gabriele 
> Svelto" <[email protected]>, "James
> Lal" <[email protected]>, "Johnny Stenback" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 2:00:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [b2g] Log collection needs improvement
> 
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Fabrice Desré <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 08/21/2014 07:51 AM, Andreas Gal wrote:
> >>
> >> console.log doesn’t have to be slow. Its only slow in Gecko. Its
> >> ridiculously fast in Chrome. We should probably simply optimize it.
> >
> > Yes, it's very ancient code. I think when I tweaked the buffering to
> > limit memory usage some parts had not been touched since... the CVS import!
> >
> > I think it's a nice project for someone that want to get his/her hands
> > dirty with gecko stuff.
> 
> What's the action item here? Should I file a bug and point to someone?
> Who is that someone?
> We definitely need this improved so we could put more log to fulfill
> the testing needs.

Improving console.log looks interesting to me, I found also a bug 1045715 seems
related.

> 
> --
> Tim Guan-tin Chien, Engineering Manager and Front-end Lead, Firefox
> OS, Mozilla Corp. (Taiwan)
> _______________________________________________
> dev-b2g mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
> 
_______________________________________________
dev-b2g mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g

Reply via email to