On 11 June 2015 at 06:17, Paul Theriault <[email protected]> wrote:
> We discussed this in another thread, but Jonas convinced me that pinning > will not have any security side-effects, and I’ve updated the permission > model to reflect this [1]. > To clarify, have you decided that granting extra storage, the ability to run in the background and the ability to appear in the web activity picker will have nothing to do with whether or not the site is pinned, so Gecko doesn't need to know? Does that mean that the user will always be prompted for these permissions instead? > I assume “installation” will remain for add-ons and will remain as gate to > implicit permissions. That's my understanding too, that add-ons will be "installed". Ben
_______________________________________________ dev-b2g mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
