Tim Guan-tin Chien 於 07/14/2015 03:30 PM 寫道:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Jonas Sicking <[email protected]> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 11:15 PM, Tim Guan-tin Chien
<[email protected]> wrote:
What does module ownership has to do with versions, or MoCo employment
in any way?
I agree we should tag inactive developers as "(inactive)" but that's it.
Actually, if someone is no longer contributing, then they are not
appropriate as peers or module owners.
I.e. the reason someone makes a good peer or owner is that they are
active and contribute to the development and improvement of the
module. That doesn't have to be contributions in the form of code.
Reviews, or responding to questions, or participating in discussions
about the future of the module are all perfectly fine forms of
contributions.
But if someone is not at least being responsive about questions to the
module, then they are no longer a good candidate for module ownership
or peer.
That said, I agree that employment is not a requirement.
/ Jonas
Is there a process exist to remove an inactive module owner/peer other
than ask them to resign willingly?
This is definitely the question I just wanted to raise :)
Best regards,
Hsinyi
_______________________________________________
dev-gaia mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-gaia
--
Hsin-Yi Tsai 蔡欣宜
Mozilla Taiwan
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
dev-b2g mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
