-----Original Message-----
From: Kyle Evans <[email protected]>
Date: 2022-04-12, Tuesday at 18:04
To: Ravi Pokala <[email protected]>
Cc: src-committers <[email protected]>,
"<[email protected]>" <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 454630c72556 - main - stand: libefi: swap /Pci() printing around
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 7:57 PM Ravi Pokala <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: <[email protected]> on behalf of Kyle Evans
<[email protected]>
> Date: 2022-04-12, Tuesday at 17:34
> To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>,
<[email protected]>
> Subject: git: 454630c72556 - main - stand: libefi: swap /Pci() printing
around
>
> The branch main has been updated by kevans:
>
> URL:
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=454630c72556d45e401f29f56b3317c2fb0499a0
>
> commit 454630c72556d45e401f29f56b3317c2fb0499a0
> Author: Kyle Evans <[email protected]>
> AuthorDate: 2022-04-13 00:29:54 +0000
> Commit: Kyle Evans <[email protected]>
> CommitDate: 2022-04-13 00:30:30 +0000
>
> stand: libefi: swap /Pci() printing around
>
> Printing device followed by interface matches, e.g., edk2. Note
that
> this is only a fallback, many firmware implementations will
provide the
> protocol that we'll use to format device paths.
>
> "(device,function)" makes more sense anyway, since that's the logical
organization (i.e. each unique device may have multiple functions).
>
> What was the rationale for doing "(function,device)" in the first place?
>
Based on tsoome's reaction when I pointed it out, the rationale was
"whoops" :-)
That's a perfectly valid rationale! ;-)
-Ravi (rpokala@)
