On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:05:55PM +0000, Andrew Turner wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 11 Jan 2023, at 11:09, Konstantin Belousov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 08:21:20PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> On 1/4/23 7:59 PM, Jessica Clarke wrote:
> >>> On 5 Jan 2023, at 03:50, Cy Schubert <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> 
> >>>> In message <[email protected]>, John 
> >>>> Baldwin
> >>>> writ
> >>>> es:
> >>>>> The branch main has been updated by jhb:
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> URL: 
> >>>>> https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=b069d3e0193121ff6de348f68c7ce93e
> >>>>> e61e5e2f
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> commit b069d3e0193121ff6de348f68c7ce93ee61e5e2f
> >>>>> Author:     John Baldwin <[email protected]>
> >>>>> AuthorDate: 2023-01-04 22:55:00 +0000
> >>>>> Commit:     John Baldwin <[email protected]>
> >>>>> CommitDate: 2023-01-04 22:55:00 +0000
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>    rtld: Revert "When loading dso without PT_GNU_STACK phdr, only call"
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>    After the removal of ia64 and sparc64, all current architectures
> >>>>>    support executable stacks at an architectural level.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>>    This reverts commit 1290d38ac50b3afa7e5781d9d97346a1042c736c.
> >>>> 
> >>>> I tried git log as follows in two independent repos, my "prod" repo and 
> >>>> the
> >>>> working repo I commit from:
> >>>> 
> >>>> slippy$ git log 1290d38ac50b3afa7e5781d9d97346a1042c736c
> >>>> fatal: bad object 1290d38ac50b3afa7e5781d9d97346a1042c736c
> >>>> slippy$
> >>>> 
> >>>> Could there be some corruption somewhere? Do other people have the same
> >>>> result as I do when they run git log against that hash? Or are my repos
> >>>> corrupted?
> >>>> 
> >>>> When I run git log and search for the string "When loading dso without
> >>>> PT_GNU_STACK phdr, only call", I find the following, suggesting that the
> >>>> svn2git process may have resulted in different hashes in different repos
> >>>> used by  different people.
> >>>> 
> >>>> commit cb38d4941c45e3c72c4b5b3fad87d297d950cf53
> >>>> Author:     Konstantin Belousov <[email protected]>
> >>>> AuthorDate: Tue Jan 25 21:12:31 2011 +0000
> >>>> Commit:     Konstantin Belousov <[email protected]>
> >>>> CommitDate: Tue Jan 25 21:12:31 2011 +0000
> >>>> 
> >>>>    When loading dso without PT_GNU_STACK phdr, only call
> >>>>    __pthread_map_stacks_exec() on architectures that allow executable
> >>>>    stacks.
> >>>> 
> >>>>    Reported and tested by: marcel (ia64)
> >>>> 
> >>>> Notes:
> >>>>    svn path=/head/; revision=217851
> >>>> 
> >>>> BTW, our GH read-only mirror has the same hash as above suggesting that
> >>>> jhb's repo may not be in sync with others with regard to svn2git 
> >>>> generated
> >>>> commits?
> >>>> 
> >>>> Or, does this point to a deeper problem with inconsistent repos or some
> >>>> other svn2git inconsistency somewhere?
> >>> 
> >>> It’s the hash from the old GitHub mirror that's now 
> >>> freebsd/freebsd-legacy.
> >> 
> >> Interesting, that is the hash I got from git blame for some reason.  I 
> >> might
> >> have done the blame in CheriBSD though which has a complicated history 
> >> where
> >> it merged commits from the old hashes up to a point when the new hashes
> >> were published, then CheriBSD has a special merge commit to join the old 
> >> and
> >> new histories before merging the new hashes from that point forwards.
> > 
> > I have pristine clone of the official FreeBSD src repo, which I used when
> > did the review and look up the referenced commit.  It worked for me.
> > I suspect/believe that the svn->git conversion also imported old hashes.
> 
> Which branches does "git branch -a --contains 
> 1290d38ac50b3afa7e5781d9d97346a1042c736c” list? For me I only see it on 
> branches that have been migrated from the old hashes.

Hm, it is remotes/github/master
And remotes:
        github  [email protected]:freebsd/freebsd-src.git

Reply via email to