OK done .. and you are right .. the fix was my responsibility .. if I didn't
have the time to complete it I should have left it for a while longer in my
disk :-(.
For the record, Dragonfly added incomplete support for the GNU -d option, but I
didn't find that interesting, and I have no plans to merge that.
Pedro.
On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 11:37:08 PM GMT-5, Warner Losh <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023, 10:07 PM Pedro Giffuni <[email protected]> wrote:
(Sorry for top posting)
Oh yes, the analysis is fine, and it is quicker to fix than what I had in mind.
I'll take a look at fixing it now, but due to external issues I may have to
leave the fix for next weekend.
Ah great. I'll not have time to fix this... thanks for taking care of this...
sorry if i was a It grumpy... it's been a day...
Warner
Pedro.
On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 11:00:51 PM GMT-5, Warner Losh <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Mon, Jul 3, 2023, 9:34 PM Pedro Giffuni <[email protected]> wrote:
Hmm ...
Dragonfly has no armv7 or i386, so they didn't get it too wrong.I guess the
int64_t would be a quick fix or another option, which I was consideirng, was to
look at unsigning it but taking care of the edge cases ... I was too lazy for
that.
Please go ahead and do the quick fix ;)
What makes you say it's a quick fix? If the calculations need 64 bits, int64_t
is the proper data type. How is that analysis wrong?
Also, it's tradition that you should fix it...
Warner
