The branch main has been updated by imp:

URL: 
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=9b54998d1bdd5098d5538052024f88edcd625b4f

commit 9b54998d1bdd5098d5538052024f88edcd625b4f
Author:     Warner Losh <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: 2026-01-11 06:22:41 +0000
Commit:     Warner Losh <[email protected]>
CommitDate: 2026-01-11 19:36:02 +0000

    MAINTAINERS/CODEOWNERS: Add myself to mpr, mps and mpi3mr
    
    Yea, I realize these are decaying, but I'm going to take a run at
    automatically tagging reviews for github pull requests. I suspect that
    tagging will help with the 'stale' issues with at least CODEOWNER.  As
    better data becomes available, especailly for contrib, I'll update
    things.
    
    Sponsored by:           Netflix
---
 .github/CODEOWNERS | 3 +++
 MAINTAINERS        | 3 +++
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/.github/CODEOWNERS b/.github/CODEOWNERS
index 98ef1f5db2ce..63d8e9869c1c 100644
--- a/.github/CODEOWNERS
+++ b/.github/CODEOWNERS
@@ -83,6 +83,9 @@
 /sys/dev/iscsi/        @trasz
 /sys/dev/nctgpio/      @stephane-rochoy-stormshield
 /sys/dev/ncthwm/       @stephane-rochoy-stormshield
+/sys/dev/mpi3mr        @bsdimp
+/sys/dev/mps   @bsdimp
+/sys/dev/mpr   @bsdimp
 /sys/dev/nvd   @bsdimp
 /sys/dev/nvme  @bsdimp
 /sys/dev/pci   @bsdimp @bsdjhb
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index e32822f8675d..fd3d4c40d508 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ lpr           gad     Pre-commit review requested, 
particularly for
 nanobsd                imp     Pre-commit phabricator review requested.
 net80211       adrian  Pre-commit review requested, send to 
[email protected]
 nfs            [email protected], rmacklem is best for reviews.
+mpi3mr(4)      imp     Pre-commit review requested.
+mpr(4)         imp     Pre-commit review requested.
+mps(4)         imp     Pre-commit review requested.
 nvd(4)         imp     Pre-commit review requested.
 nvme(4)                imp     Pre-commit review requested.
 nvmecontrol(8) imp     Pre-commit review requested.

Reply via email to