On Sat, Jan 02, 2021 at 10:09:04PM -0700, Alan Somers wrote: > On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 9:39 PM Jessica Clarke <jrt...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On 3 Jan 2021, at 02:59, Alan Somers <asom...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > diff --git a/sys/kern/syscalls.master b/sys/kern/syscalls.master > > > index b7ea5e939635..aaa0a1277461 100644 > > > --- a/sys/kern/syscalls.master > > > +++ b/sys/kern/syscalls.master > > > @@ -1477,7 +1477,17 @@ > > > _In_opt_ struct sigevent *sig > > > ); > > > } > > > -258-271 AUE_NULL UNIMPL nosys > > > +258 AUE_AIO_WRITEV STD { > > > + int aio_writev( > > > + _Inout_ struct aiocb *aiocbp > > > + ); > > > + } > > > +259 AUE_AIO_READV STD { > > > + int aio_readv( > > > + _Inout_ struct aiocb *aiocbp > > > + ); > > > + } > > > +260-271 AUE_NULL UNIMPL nosys > > > 272 AUE_O_GETDENTS COMPAT11 { > > > int getdents( > > > int fd, > > > > Should these not be added to the end? > > > > Jess > > > > Should they be? I'm not aware of any requirement to add new syscalls to > the end. I put them here so they would be next to the other AIO syscalls.
Yes. I'm sorry I missed this in the review. It's vastly easier to audit these files and address conflicts if they are append-only. We're also using these syscall numbers internally specifically to avoid conflicts with new syscalls. Please move them to the end. I do see that we only provide extremely outdated advice in the comments of syscalls.master. I'll take a look at improving this and the wiki page. Thanks, Brooks
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature