Ulrich Spörlein uqs at FreeBSD.org wrote on Wed Jan 20 09:49:49 UTC 2021 :
> While here, drop the redundant branch name from the git output and don't > count commits in shallow clones. > The branch name part of the patch breaks how I work with multiple branches and I will be locally "reverting" it in my branches unless FreeBSD itself reverts it. For my context it even breaks how I would work for main vs. stable/12 if I ever did something with stable/12 . (I'm not using shallow clones, it is the branch name removal that messes up my specific way of working.) In other words, for how I choose to work, the branch name is not redundant. Going in another direction: mixing gitup/clone-counting and the branch name removal in the same commit and in the code structure means that I'm unable to just skip a commit to deal with the branch name issue. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar) _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/dev-commits-src-main To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
