On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 07:02:00PM -0800, Enji Cooper (yaneurabeya) wrote:
>
> > On Feb 4, 2026, at 1:17 PM, Konstantin Belousov <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 10:25:27PM -0800, Enji Cooper (yaneurabeya) wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Feb 3, 2026, at 2:38 AM, Konstantin Belousov <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 11:08:40AM +0100, Abdelkader Boudih wrote:
> >>>> I agree that this should not be permanent verbosity.
> >>>>
> >>>> The aim was not to add long-term noise, but to make the behavior
> >>>> observable/greppable to reviewers while this logic is still being
> >>>> validated across a wide range of Apple models.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm going to get few Apple devices to try on. Once we confirm that every
> >>>> model behave the same, we could totally remove verbosity and treating it
> >>>> as assumed-working code.
> >>
> >> One sidenote: this is hidden behind bootverbose: it’s not always being
> >> displayed.
> >>
> >> I think it’s fine making the message more terse. It might clarify behavior
> >> on Apple platforms since the added behavior contradicts other OSI-related
> >> behavior and can result in a POLA violation.
> >
> > Can you fix it, please, instead thinking that it might be fine?
>
> Done:
> https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=9c666de5b339d3c8f9bf3963691e4310e7d159cb
> -Enji
Thank you.
