> On 28. Feb 2026, at 02:44, Gleb Smirnoff <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2026 at 08:11:39AM +0100, Michael Tuexen wrote: > M> >> - so = sopeeloff(head); > M> >> + so = sopeeloff(head, &sctp_stream_protosw); > M> > > M> > This part of the change broke LINT-NOINET because sctp_stream_protosw is > only defined in the INET case. I didn’t dig into the SCTP syscalls too far, > but I think that the right protocol needs to be picked per the address > family, right? > > btw, I tried to move the function to sctp_syscalls.c and this required > exposing > soattach() and soalloc() outside. After weighting in and out decided to leave > it the way it is. I tried that also and came to the same conclusion. That is why I added the parameter to sopeeloff().
Best regards Michael > > -- > Gleb Smirnoff
